Search for: ""Edwards v. Arizona" OR "451 U.S. 477"" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 10:36 am by Orin Kerr
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:20 am by David Markus
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct.1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981).ABSURD!! [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:49 am by Bob Farb
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) (assertion of right to counsel requires officers to immediately stop custodial interrogation), to a juvenile’s assertion of the statutory right to have a parent present during custodial interrogation and ruled that the resumption of questioning in the absence of counsel or a parent was improper in Smith. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 6:49 am by Bob Farb
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) (assertion of right to counsel requires officers to immediately stop custodial interrogation), to a juvenile’s assertion of the statutory right to have a parent present during custodial interrogation and ruled that the resumption of questioning in the absence of counsel or a parent was improper in Smith. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm by Jon Sands
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 2:58 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) and United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
  For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counsel present in the aftermath of his capture, that the defendants’ trio of subsequent written waivers of his Miranda and prompt-presentment rights were invalid, and that the government violated the 5th and 6th amendments by preventing defendant’s counsel from locating him after his capture. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Zachary Spilman
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) to the facts of this case. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) to the facts of this case. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm by Terry Lenamon
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981) (which most criminal defendants know is the wise thing to do before answering any questions from the police), and you have a lot of demand for effective legal counsel without enough supply. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:09 pm
Note that the United States States Supreme Court came to the opposite conclusion in Edwards v Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1991), finding that the defendant must initiate the second interview in order for interrogation to resume after a request to speak with a lawyer. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:56 am by Robert Guest
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-85 (1981) Remember kids, ask for a lawyer, then ask for a lawyer, then ask for a lawyer. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:39 am
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880 (1981), for the Fifth Amendment right to have counsel present at any custodial interrogation under Miranda. [read post]