Search for: ""Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois" OR "431 U.S. 720"" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm by David Walk
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), that indirect purchasers do not have standing to bring antitrust claims, a rule the Third Circuit extended to RICO actions in McCarthy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 8:06 am
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720, 742-47 (1977), who were found not to have antitrust standing. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:10 pm by Dan Bushell
Supreme Court's landmark 1977 decision, Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., No. 07-210 (U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), can nevertheless sue under state antitrust laws), and unjust enrichment claims (the issue mostly being whether there's a legitimate separate cause of action). [read post]