Search for: ""Illinois v. Gates" OR "462 U.S. 213""
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 4:21 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
See, e.g., Gates, 462 U.S. at 243-44. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 3:26 pm
Gates, 462 U.S.213 (1983)(totality of circumstances test is to be used to determine whether probable cause supports the issuance of a search warrant.) [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:32 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (19 [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 3:00 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:03 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983). [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 7:50 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232, 103 S. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 235 (1983))). [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:46 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)) This evidence gathering depends in part upon the officer’s observations of the driver’s actions and conduct. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:48 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 237-238, 103 S.Ct. 2317 (1983). [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:17 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 223, 103 S. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:30 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 (1983), where we are told that the Supreme Court has “repeatedly said that after‐ the‐fact scrutiny by courts of the sufficiency of an affidavit should not take the form of de novo review. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:02 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 237 n.10 (1983). [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:30 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 (1983). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:53 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 (1983), probable cause is a "fair probability" on the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:46 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 (1983)). [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 3:29 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm
Gates, 462 U.S.213 (1983)(totality of circumstances test is to be used to determine whether probable cause supports the issuance of a search warrant.) [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983), and adopted under the state constitution in State v. [read post]