Search for: ""Kyllo v. United States" OR "533 U.S. 27""
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 9:02 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) (ruling that the use of thermal imaging technology on a house was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001) (ruling that the use of thermal imaging technology on a house was a Fourth Amendment search). [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 10:52 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
;United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
533 U.S. 27 (2001). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
See Kyllo v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 8:52 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27(2001)). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:35 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 33 (2001), citing Katz v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 33 (2001); see Katz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 33 (2001); see Katz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015). [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:39 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm
United States, 533 U.S. 27, 34 (2001)). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), grappled with a similar invasion of privacy in the context of one’s home. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
