Search for: ""Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council" OR "505 U.S. 1003""
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003); the County’s actions amounted to a regulatory taking under the factor-based Penn Central test (Penn Central Transp. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:11 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:15 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003, nor have they suffered a taking under Penn Central Transp. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1027-28 (1992)). [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992)), and they failed to establish that they suffered a taking under the more general test of Penn Central Trans. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:23 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:54 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1012-13, 112 S.Ct. 2886, 120 L.Ed.2d 798 (1992) (noting that a takings plaintiff's opportunity to apply for a special permit "goes only to the prudential 'ripeness'" and deciding that prudence dictated that the Court reach the merits in that case-given that Article III injury had properly been alleged-since the special permit scheme that the… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council (1992) 505 U.S. 1003 held that state law defines property rights for purposes of taking analysis, and established the “categorical” rule that a regulation’s deprivation of all beneficial economic use of a property constitutes a per se compensable taking. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:42 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1027 (Lucas) that if a regulation has the effect of depriving an owner of all economically beneficial use of their property, a permanent taking has occurred. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1027-30 (1992)). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1019 (1992).) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003, 1019 (1992).) [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:30 am
Amparada en esa ley, la Gobernadora Wanda Vázquez, declaró un estado de emergencia por Covid-19(23). [read post]
