Search for: ""Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd." OR "561 U.S. 247"" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 5:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), and RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 10:09 am by Sandy
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), precludes claims arising out of foreign‐issued securities  purchased  on  foreign  exchanges,  but  cross‐listed  on  a domestic exchange. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 6:02 am
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), held that the anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws have no extraterritorial effect, and as a consequence apply only to transactions in securities that occur on a U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:45 pm by Matthew B. Kaplan
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), the Supreme Court has held that, as a general rule, federal statutes do not apply overseas unless Congress clearly indicates that the statute so applies. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:45 pm by Matthew B. Kaplan
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), the Supreme Court has held that, as a general rule, federal statutes do not apply overseas unless Congress clearly indicates that the statute so applies. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
National Australia Bank Ltd. 561 U.S. 247 (2010), which reduced the potential exposure of U.S. listed foreign firms to securities litigation (see Bartlett, 2015; Licht et al., 2017). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:58 pm by Ken Herzinger
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), held that the anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws have no extraterritorial effect, and as a consequence apply only to transactions in securities that occur on a U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:58 pm by Ken Herzinger
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010), held that the anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws have no extraterritorial effect, and as a consequence apply only to transactions in securities that occur on a U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:59 am by SHG
National Australia Bank, Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 255 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted; quoting EEOC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
National Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010) (post here), the Supreme Court held that federal securities laws generally reach only “domestic” purchases and sales. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  Usually, this occurs when governments issue surveillance directives requiring production of data held outside their national borders. [read post]