Search for: ""Palazzolo v. Rhode Island" OR "533 U.S. 606""
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 627 (2001). [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 2:57 pm
Rhode Island (2001) 533 U.S. 606, the court stated that if the City’s rule were accepted, “[a] state would be allowed, in effect, to put an expiration date on the Takings Clause. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:45 pm
Rhode Island (2001) 533 U.S. 606, holding that even a plaintiff who buys land already subject to regulation may pursue a takings claim. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:03 am
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 622, 121 S.Ct. 2448, 150 L.Ed.2d 592 (2001) (holding in a takings case that the "[r]ipeness doctrine does not require a landowner to submit applications for their own sake"); Village of Palatine, Ill., 37 F.3d at 1234. [read post]
