Search for: ""Quill Corp. v. North Dakota" OR "504 U.S. 298""
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992) , and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 12:41 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
This brings Louisiana into line with other states that impose sales tax and have acted to require marketplace facilitators such as Amazon and E-Bay to begin collecting state taxes after the Supreme Court’s decision in Wayfair[10] which overturned the physical presence requirement for nexus set out in Quill.[11] A “marketplace facilitator “is defined in the new law as any person that facilitates a sale for a marketplace seller through a marketplace by doing either of the… [read post]
21 May 2019, 8:27 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois10 and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
North Dakota In Quill v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:03 pm
South Dakota v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 10:50 am
Department of Revenue of Ill., 386 U.S. 753 (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
No, 17-494, 585 U.S. __ (June 21, 2018). [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
North Dakota (91-0194), 504 U.S. 298 (1992). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:10 pm
Quill refers to Quill Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:25 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), which bars states from enforcing sales taxes against retailers who lack a "physical presence" in... [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Cty. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:34 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determino que no podía requerirle el cobro de impuestos a tiendas que no tuviera presencia en el estado en que residía el comprador. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:30 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), the Supreme Court held that states cannot collect sales... [read post]
