Search for: ""Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc." OR "552 U.S. 312""
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 1:37 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), doesn’t apply to IDE devices, Burgos is OK to that extent.The decision also kicks out a somewhat bizarre claim based on purported improper record-keeping that, while invoking 21 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:39 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 330 (2008). [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:24 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); our numerous postson the subject. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:37 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008) (state law claims that impose requirements “different from or in addition to” FDA’s PMA requirements are preempted). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), where he held that most tort claims against PMA devices are expressly preempted by a federal statute. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 326-27 (2008); Bruesewitz v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:02 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008).Not so fast.This amended complaint was essentially a regulatory "dump. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), over whether tort claims could be “requirements” within the meaning of the statute. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
More recently, the Supreme Court in Riegel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:17 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); and Cipollone v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:50 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312, 128 S.Ct. 999, 169 L.Ed.2d 892 (2008) the United States Supreme Court affirmed that the express pre-emption clause in the Medical Device Amendments (MDA) of 1976, 21 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
Medtronic Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)Graphic Warnings: D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 4:44 pm
Medtronic Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)Graphic Warnings: D.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008)) between §510k “substantial equivalence” clearance and premarket approval. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 6:37 am
Medtronic, Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); finding PMA preemption under Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]