Search for: ""Strickland v. Washington" OR "466 U.S. 668"" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), then the ruling could be applied retroactively to convictions entered prior to 2010. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am by Jon Sands
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), because there was no Sixth Amendment duty to advise about the collateral consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), isn't clearly established federal law under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The majority held that despite the language in the New York Court of Appeals decision,People v Benevento (91 N.Y.2d 708, 714 [1998]), that “whether defendant would have been acquitted of the charges but for counsel’s errors isrelevant, but not dispositive" under the Baldi standard such a finding is, in fact dispositive under People v Baldi (54 NY2d 137 [1981]), since "it is hard to envision a scenario where an error that meets the prejudice prong of… [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm by Viking
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).See United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Washington,466 U.S. 668 (1984), standard, trial counsel “must give the client the benefit of counsel’s professional advice on [the] crucial decision of whether to plead guilty. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), when it determined that Williams's defense was not prejudiced by the lack of a plain meaning instruction. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), because his counsel failed to object to the imposition of the stun-belt restraint. [read post]