Search for: ""Strickland v. Washington" OR "466 U.S. 668""
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:54 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) The post Petitions of the week appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
” Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:51 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, a defendant must show that his counsel performed deficiently, and that deficient performance prejudiced the defendant. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), un confinado debe establecer que la representación legal fue por debajo del estándar objetivo de razonabilidad, y que la forma deficiente en que laboró su representación legal fue lo que ocasionó que fuera perjudicado. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); State v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 5:20 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 ( 1984 ). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is the "clearly established federal law" that governs claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in noncapital sentencing proceedings for purposes of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1994), to justify setting aside his sentence. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1994), to justify setting aside his sentence. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
Washington,466 U.S. 668 (1984)] and Hill [v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:03 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), to prevail on an ineffective assistance claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), because there was no Sixth Amendment duty to advise about the collateral consequences of a guilty plea. [read post]