Search for: ""Teague v. Lane" OR "489 U.S. 288""
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2013, 2:33 pm
Commonwealth of Kentucky 559 U.S. _____, does not apply retroactively under the Teague Rule 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 306 (1989). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:51 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether United States Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases, or may a state court apply state-law -or state-constitution- based retroactivity tests that afford application of Supreme Court decisions to a broader class of criminal defendants than the class defined by Teague? [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether United States Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases, or may a state court apply state-law- or state-constitution-based retroactivity tests that afford application of Supreme Court decisions to a broader class of criminal defendants than the class defined by Teague. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:50 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether United States Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases, or whether a state court may apply state-law- or state-constitution-based retroactivity tests that afford application of Supreme Court decisions to a broader class of criminal defendants than the class defined by Teague.The Court held that Teague does not constrain the authority of state courts to give broader effect to… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, in 1987 and for collateral review in Teague v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 301 (1989)). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 8:41 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), because a claim of systemic delay wasn't dictated by the holdings in Furman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 (2004), and Teague v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), limit the availability of relief on a motion under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether United States Supreme Court decisions apply retroactively to state-court criminal cases, or may a state court apply state-law or state-constitution-based retroactivity tests that afford application of Supreme Court decisions to a broader class of criminal defendants than the class defined by Teague? [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:55 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), and consequently applied its holding to Petitioner Roselva Chaidez’s collateral appeal. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:21 pm
The Court applied the federal analysis set forth in Teague v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), to determine whether decisions of this Court apply retroactively in state postconviction proceedings? [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:05 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989) and the AEDPA rule of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:34 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), would bar it as impermissibly "retroactive" for purposes of federal habeas relief. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:06 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:57 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 301 (1989)). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:27 am
Lane, 489 U.S. 288 (1989), and does not apply retroactively to cases challenged on collateral review. [read post]
