Search for: ""The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co." OR "407 U.S. 1"" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 9:08 am by Erik W. Weibust
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972)], any disfavor Massachusetts harbors towards forum selection clauses—as manifested in the MNCA—does not weaken the presumption of enforceability that forum selection clauses enjoy in federal court. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 3 (1972) (construing a venue provision to be mandatory where it provided: “Any dispute arising must be treated before the London Court of Justice. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 3 (1972) (construing a venue provision to be mandatory where it provided: “Any dispute arising must be treated before the London Court of Justice. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:21 am by Paul E. Freehling
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1) criticized such thinking in part because forum selection clauses often provide consistency and certainty. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972).The court also rejected the notion that Diamond Bermuda was engaged in an impermissible collateral attack on the Netherlands judgment, on the grounds that while in general a party cannot collaterally attack the merits of a foreign judgment, it can do so on one of the limited grounds in the UFCMJRA.Judge Frost dissented and raised what I think is a strong point. [read post]