Search for: ""Wickard v. Filburn" OR "317 U.S. 111""
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2016, 1:33 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), where the Supreme Court interpreted the Commerce Clause to give Congress the power to regulate activity that has a substantial effect on interstate commerce. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) ) what couldn't the court do? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 125 (1942) (emphasis added). [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 10:13 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 125 (1942) (emphasis added). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 8:03 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82 (1942). [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 125 , 127-129 (1942); United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:10 pm
Filburn 317 U.S. 111 (1942);The Wikipedia explanation is HEREWhat the case holds is that Congress, through the Commerce Clause has the power to stop a farmer from eating the wheat he had grown. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm
Filburn (1942) 317 U.S. 111) and smoking marijuana given away for free for medicinal purposes (Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82 (1942). [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) had the effect of forcing Roscoe Filburn into the market to buy wheat, since Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Law, Literature, and Other Performing Arts, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111, 125 (1942) (emphasis added). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), and more recently, U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:05 pm
Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942) (holding that Congress could regulate home-grown wheat under its Commerce Clause power). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
