Search for: ""Wyeth v. Levine" OR "555 U.S. 555""
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2008), the Supreme Court held that the same kind of suit against manufacturers of brand-name prescription drugs is not preempted by federal law. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) and PLIVA v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), was decided more than two years ago, now. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009).That preemption battlefield is what initially prompted us to found this blog.Levine established a "clear evidence" standard for branded drug preemption, that is, "clear evidence" that the FDA would have rejected the warning proposed by the plaintiff. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:14 am
After all, since Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:48 am
555 U.S. 555, 570 (2009). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), somehow superseded Buckman, although the Court in Buckman took great pains (we'd say too great pains) to distinguish fraud on the FDA allegations. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:11 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), “clear evidence” standard. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:18 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), that if Congress wants express preemption it can say so, therefore to heck with implied preemption. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
Under Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009).So, is there a statutory sameness requirement for biosimilars that the FDA is conveniently forgetting about? [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), and weaponized by our side in PLIVA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:23 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2009 decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:54 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 570-71 (2009), about innovator manufacturer’s “responsibility” for their labels, ends up stating that “the FDA has the responsibility of weighing (in terms of extremes) the potential benefit of lifesaving medication against potential severe side effects. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:33 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:57 pm
Since the unfortunate decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009)) or not (as in Bartlett and Mensing) the defendant drug manufacturer can change its label without prior FDA approval. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:22 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) “is not to the contrary. [read post]
