Search for: ""Wyeth v. Levine" OR "555 U.S. 555""
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
See Cruz v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:01 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), particularly with regard to the need in a warnings context that there should be clear evidence that the FDA would have rejected the plaintiff’s proposed alternative label. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) and PLIVA v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:41 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009).So, is there a statutory sameness requirement for biosimilars that the FDA is conveniently forgetting about? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) “is not to the contrary. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), defendant has to demonstrate the conflict between state and federal law by “clear evidence. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 12:44 pm
Under Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Not quite two years ago, we posted about how, under Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), that the FDA would not have allowed a developmental delay warning at any time in 2003 that could conceivably have affected the pregnancy at issue in Rheinfrank:Preemption is warranted because there is clear evidence the FDA would not have approved a change to the Depakote label adding a developmental delay warning prior to [plaintiff’s] injury. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), it appeared that to argue preemption successfully, a brand-name manufacturer must provide “clear evidence” that the FDA would have rejected the relevant label changes. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), a preemption case otherwise on all fours with the facts here. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
555 U.S. at 571 (emphasis added). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:33 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 10:22 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), has no bearing because it wasn’t a design claim at all. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
The supporting citations are only from Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009)), invoked greater ire from us than the atrocity in State ex rel. [read post]
