Search for: ""Younger v. Harris" OR "401 U.S. 37""
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:58 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:35 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) was misplaced because no State proceedings challenging the amendments are pending, a requirement of Younger abstention. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), which embodies "a strong federal policy against federal-court interference with pending state judicial proceedings absent extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 4:34 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), doesn't require abstention. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). 08a0010p.06 Uhl v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:44 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and to stay the case pending the resolution of its motion. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 9:15 pm
Dyson, 421 U.S. 426, 433-34, 95 S.Ct. 1691, 44 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975) (permitting abstention under Younger v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0254p.06 2007/07/10 Hartman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), federal courts must abstain from entertaining lawsuits by an individual seeking to enjoin a criminal prosecution against him in state court where those proceedings implicate important state interests and the plaintiff has an adequate opportunity to raise his challenges in that forum. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:14 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)). [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:51 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 54 (1971) . . . [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 6:10 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), was designed to prevent. 414 U.S. at 500....We see little difference between the relief sought here and that sought in O'Shea . . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)), and the D.C. [read post]
