Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 221 - 240 of 4,392
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 11:26 am by Nonprofit Blogger
The Supreme Court today handed down its decision in the Citizens United case, striking down restrictions on political contributions and spending by corporations and labor unions. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:24 am by Walter Olson
Read fairly, Citizens United merely says that banning certain kinds of corporate expenditures infringes the constitutional interests of human beings. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm by nflatow
By Nicole Flatow Opponents of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 5:34 am by Lawrence Solum
Josh Blackman has a very useful post with excerpts from Scalia and Stevens on originalism in Citizens United. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:31 pm by Don Cruse
Most commentary about today’s Citizens United decision will focus on congressional and presidential elections. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:20 pm
"Is Citizens United already shrinking? [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm by Eva Arevuo
Related articles LA City Council to Vote on Citizens United Declaration (blogs.wsj.com) Los Angeles City Council Votes Unanimously: It’s WE the PEOPLE (dailykos.com) The Road to Citizens United (legallyeasy.rocketlawyer.com) {lang: 'ar'} [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 12:33 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Liberals have been complaining for years now about the supposed way Citizens United allows corporations license to finance election campaigns (curiously, they never mention that it also allows unions... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 3:33 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I really enjoyed this article by Harry Hutchinson, which argues that: Contrary to the Citizens United validation of a firm’s speech rights, and disregarding the possibility that government... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:29 am by Steve Bainbridge
Ripken, Susanna Kim, Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Corporate Power: The Tension between Constitutional Law and Corporate Law (August 22, 2012). [read post]
27 May 2019, 3:32 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In closing my prior post on Macey & Strine's new article on Citizens United, I asked "do Strine and Macey really want to deny [individuals] the opportunity to assert their religious liberty... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:08 pm by Sam Favate
We've seen it discussed by legal experts, political bloggers and in every newspaper in America, but now, someone who could actually claim to be an insider is talking about what he feels the Supreme Court could do when it revisits the 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:31 am by pfriedman
Ronald Dworkin criticizes  the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision — ruling that corporations are entitled under the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech to an unlimited right to contribute money to political campaigns — for the same two reasons I have. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm by Kedar
Tags: Election Law, Supreme Court Related posts Thoughts on the Citizens United Delay (December 15, 2009) Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District and the Future of Section 5 (June 24, 2009) Initial Thoughts on Rearguments in Citizens United (September 9, 2009) [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
Stephen Davis, will be seeking investor feedback on a formal recommendation to the SEC as to its potential response to the Citizens United decision. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:53 am
A recent Washington Post column by Ruth Marcus and a post on Balkinization by Yale election law scholar Heather Gerken consider whether a majority of the Justices will use the Citizens United rehearing to reverse the Court's qualified acceptance of... [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:57 am by David Brown
By Tony Mauro In an interview set for broadcast on C-SPAN this Sunday, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia vigorously defended recent controversial decisions, including the 2010 Citizens United case that has been blamed for flooding election campaigns with millions of dollars in corporate donations. [read post]