Search for: "***u. S. v. Perez"
Results 21 - 40
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Here, in Cascardo v Dratel 2021 NY Slip Op 30667(U) March 4, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 101055/2017 Judge: Erika M. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
” The Prager U v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:22 pm
Perez, 585 U. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
In Matter of Michael R v Amanda R, ___AD3d___, 2019 WL 4264401 (1stDept., 2019) the first and only day of trial on the father’s enforcement petition took place on February 2, 2016 before the Support Magistrate. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 3:58 am
, reforzar los conocimientos ya adquiridos para ello bastaría que se exija un Phd en Harvard u Oxford y tendríamos jueces del más alto nivel intelectual, la pregunta entonces es: ¿Es lo que necesita nuestro sistema de administración de justicia? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Perez, et al., No. 17-586 (Supreme Court of the United States, decided June 25, 2018). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Perez, et al., No. 17-586 (Supreme Court of the United States, decided June 25, 2018). [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
There’s been plenty of commentary on Sessions v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:17 pm
In contrast, in Marlow v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
¿Dónde están la Autonomía y Actuación funcional si existe un Consejo que le puede enmendar la plana u ordenarle cómo actuar en un tema “x”. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:29 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:37 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
The 2nd District Court of Appeal recently affirmed a ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Jane Johnson in Perez v. [read post]
