Search for: "**a & D Intern. v. Century" Results 61 - 80 of 986
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Anthony Colangelo
He is the coauthor with Anthony D’Amato of the Law of Nations Scholars amicus brief submitted in support of neither party in Kiobel v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:44 am
The allocation of risk between two sophisticated international shippers isn't something about which I'm profoundly concerned. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:20 am
Igbinedion, Finding value for the right to development in international law Serges Djoyou Kamga, A call for a ‘right to development’- informed pan-Africanism in the twenty-first century Annelie de Man, The Sustainable Development Goals and the rights-based approach to development : compatible or missing the point? [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 6:38 am by Cecilia Marcela Bailliet
What is at stake is the viability of the international community to uphold humanity at the universal level. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am by John L. Welch
Thomas McCarthy (Moderator), A Century of Trademark Law - Looking Back and Looking Forward.INTA Amicus Brief in International Hair Cosmetics Ltd. v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:50 am
Anderson, Recent Judicial Decisions concerning Maritime Delimitation Gudmumdur Eiriksson, The Bay of Bengal case before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea María Teresa Infante-Caffi, The Decision on the Maritime Boundary between Chile and Perú: International Law Revisited Rafael Nieto-Navia, Some Remarks on the Territorial and Maritime Dispute: Nicaragua v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Gebhart, 32 Del.Ch. 343, 87 A.2d 862 (Ch.1952), aff'd, 33 Del.Ch. 144, 91 A.2d 137 (Supr.Ct.1952), Chancellor Seitz made it clear that the separate but equal doctrine of Plessy v. [read post]