Search for: "**cohen v. I. N. S" Results 121 - 140 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Susan Collins of Maine that Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
(i) Physician assistants corporation. (1) Licensed physicians and surgeons. (2) Registered nurses. (3) Licensed acupuncturists. (4) Naturopathic doctors. (5) Licensed midwives. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161,… [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 5:00 am by Julio César Córdoba
Una mirada desde dos orillas del Pacífico: México y la República Popular China Miguel RÁBAGO DORBECKER Últimas novedades en el régimen común de propiedad industrial en la Comunidad Andina Fabio COHENE A propriedade intelectual como instrumento de proteção jurídica dos resultados de I+D e da inovação no agronegócio Luiz O. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA found that the respondent met the standards for a motion to remand, citing Matter of Coelho, 20 I&N Dec 464 (BIA 1992). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
The BIA found that the respondent met the standards for a motion to remand, citing Matter of Coelho, 20 I&N Dec 464 (BIA 1992). [read post]