Search for: "**u. S. v. Jane" Results 61 - 80 of 136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ross v Saravanos ;2011 NY Slip Op 31310(U) ; May 8, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 108017/2010; Judge: Emily Jane Goodman tells us that the shooter was sued in plenty of time, but the hotel was not, and that a case against the attorneys may continue on in legal malpractice. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:48 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Spencer Ackerman at Wired’s Danger Room blog shares the news that four special ops officers were killed in Djibouti when their U-28 plane crashed. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
Panzella, 13 Misc 3d 130(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51842(U) (App Term, 1st Dept 2006) (affirming small claim court's award of damages to plaintiff chiropractor because, in disregard of assignment, defendant attorney failed to make direct payment of medical fees to plaintiff upon attorney's receipt of client's personal injury action settlement proceeds); Williamsburg South Medical v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:05 am
Statutory rights to due process in a disciplinary action  Matter of Soleyn v New York City Department of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 32604(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 106290/10, Judge: Emily Jane Goodman. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 6:41 am
  The judge then explains that [u]nder Local Civil Rule 7–10, Uber certifies that it attempted to identify John Doe I without success. . . . [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Let’s say John Smith, a citizen of Connecticut, along with Jane Doe, a citizen of New Jersey, are co-members of Generic LLC, a New York limited liability company. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 4:40 am by Susan Brenner
  As the court noted, [u]nlike direct evidence in which a witness testifies about a matter within the witness's personal knowledge such that the trier of fact is not required to draw an inference from the evidence to the proposition that it is offered to establish, circumstantial evidence requires the drawing of inferences that are reasonably permitted by the evidence.State v. [read post]