Search for: "*1**u.s. v. May" Results 161 - 180 of 27,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2017, 7:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Virginia 16-1337 Issues: (1) Whether Virginia may refuse to give effect to Miller v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 3:05 am
LEXIS 31908 (ED WA, May 1, 2007), a federal magistrate judge held that a prisoner's free exercise rights were not substantially burdened by the removal and destruction of his religious materials that deprived him of the ability to study for 30 days.In Kuperman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:16 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
 In an order entered September 1, 2011 in the MDL case In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation, Judge James Lawrence King of the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:28 pm
Attorney should do when (1) s/he's got a case in front of the Ninth Circuit, (2) in which the AUSA might well have committed misconduct. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1366 Issues: (1) Whether the retroactivity analysis of Teague v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 8:58 pm
Doll 1:09-cv-00820; filed May 4, 2009 in the District Court of the District of Columbia Review and correction of the patent term adjustment calculation made by the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2007, 3:43 am
The V-shaped black granite slabs, on which are inscribed the names of 58,000 U.S. servicemembers killed in the conflict, now stands on the Mall in Washington, D.C.... 1945, Maine-born Mildred Gillars made her last Nazi propaganda broadcast for Radio Berlin. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 12:27 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 91805 (D MD, June 1, 2018), a Maryland federal district court dismissed an inmate's complaint that he was served sausage with pork products in it for breakfast on one day.In Savastano v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 12:10 am
Teleflex decision:Scenario #1: Revive "synergism" test, where a combination of elements must result in an effect that is greater than the sum of the separate parts (Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc., v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Langford  16-886 Issues: (1) Whether a state court unreasonably applied this court’s cases under Section 2254(d)(1) when it held that a misplaced adverb in one jury instruction on state law did not violate federal due process; and (2) whether the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2011, 6:58 am
May 1, 2011): Gomez does not allege any basis for his claim that a motion to suppress should have been filed, other than it is “elementary to make motions to suppress. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 11:03 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court May Be Next”: Michael Roberts of Westword has an article that begins, “By a 2-1 margin, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a Fort Collins ordinance making female toplessness a crime is unconstitutional. [read post]