Search for: "*akers, in the Matter of"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 4:06 am
This post seeks to bring matters up to date. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
On Wednesday it will also hear the appeal of Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group regarding whether, as a matter of English private international law, equitable proprietary rights can be created in assets situated in a country where the lex situs does not recognise or permit the creation of such rights, in particular. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:00 am
Akers, 2009 WL 528784 (Tenn. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 3:44 am
…In determining whether a negative inference is permissible, the privilege analysis is applied on a question-by-question basis… (quoting Akers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
While the newspapers did not accept that they had breached the terms of the Code, the matter was resolved when the PCC negotiated the publication of letters from the complainant in the two newspapers. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
In the matter of D (A child), heard on 23 May 2016. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:05 am
Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group, heard 27-28 April 2016. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
If the results of your Illinois divorce hearing or trial matter to you, contact my Chicago, Illinois family law firm to speak with an experienced Illinois divorce attorney. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:12 am
He resigned over the matter in 2011 following further revelations discrediting his conclusion. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:40 am
http://tinyurl.com/2e2xayx (Department of Commerce) Judge Facciola Denies Proportionality Request - http://tinyurl.com/23hf26m (Michael Arkfeld) No Matter How Inadequate a Party's Preservation Efforts May Be...Sanctions Are Not Warranted Unless There is Proof that Some Information of Significance has Actually Been Lost - http://tinyurl.com/2fvwk3m (K&L Gates) Protect Your Data During U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The matter will return to court on 16 November 2012. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:34 pm
@FT https://t.co/BSCbAuw33a— James (Jim) Walker (@CruiseLaw) July 11, 2023Royal Caribbean’s Oasis of the Seas: Paroc’s website states that the Oasis of the Seas, which was built by STX Europe (formerly Aker Yards) over ten years ago in Turku, Finland, was insulated with Paroc insulation products. [read post]
Appellate Decision in Partnership Dispute Clarifies Distinction Between Direct and Derivative Claims
13 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
In an apparent issue of first impression, Justice Scarpulla agreed with the plaintiff, holding: Absent a controlling New York precedent in the context of BCL § 505 (h) and self-interested transactions, I follow Delaware’s case law and find that BCL § 505 (h) does not shield the Director Defendants’ judgment in this self-interested transaction as a matter of law. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:28 am
The case, Matter of Jacobs v Cartalemi, was decided last week by the Appellate Division, Second Department, along with two decisions in companion appeals in related cases in which the court held that upon withdrawal the minority member also lost his standing to pursue derivative claims against the controlling member. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am
In the leading New York case, Marx v Akers, 88 NY2d 189 [1996], the Court of Appeals noted criticism of what it called Aronson‘s “reasonable doubt threshold of Delaware’s two-fold approach to demand futility” and formulated its own three-part standard: (1) Demand is excused because of futility when a complaint alleges with particularity that a majority of the board of directors is interested in the challenged transaction. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
It was held that “Blogger.com” was not liable for the publication of defamatory material – it was “purely passive wall” with no responsibility for internet “graffiti” no matter how offensive or libellous. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
The Claimants were successful on appeal to the Court of Appeal and, thereafter, the Bank appealed to the Supreme Court in February 2017 (Akers and others v Samba Financial Group [2017] UKSC 6). [read post]
