Search for: "*clark v. Little General Stores" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
 The 152 witnesses were not a fair sample of the general public. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it… [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Although there is little case law yet in Canada on "gun-jumping", merging parties must be careful in sharing competitively sensitive information - particularly when it comes to observing the applicable waiting period. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:09 pm by Bill
Jim Ed Brown came out to host the last half hour, brought to you, friends, by the Cracker Barrel Restaurants and General Store. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:39 am by Robin Frazer Clark
I bet they wish they had been a little more careful with their cellphone! [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by Mark Walsh
Johnson later famously nominated Ramsay Clark as attorney general when he wanted to prod the elder Clark to retire from the court and make way for a vacancy.) [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm by Jack Goldsmith
 As I say in the Sanger story, Daniel here implies that store v. disclose is “not an issue that should just be left to the N.S.A. or the F.B.I. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
Cheaper secret santa friendly versions are also available.3 -     No love and affection for XOXO (Global Brand Holdings v EUIPO, EU General Court, Case T‑503/19 (May 2020))To me, the mark XOXO means nothing at all. [read post]