Search for: "*daniel v. Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
11 May 2017, 4:35 am
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:18 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck dove deep on a different Guantanamo detention case: Hamdi v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Kentucky v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
Daniel Kelemen, Gregory A. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Brackeen AB 599/1 37 6/15/23 21-1576 Smith v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 2:46 pm
ShareMonday’s argument in Smith v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
The ‘863 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Brass Smith, LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
On October 26, Geoffrey Stone, University of Chicago Law School, will deliver The Warren Court v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:36 pm
Arrington v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
SMITH. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Kelly and Smith v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am
” The full list of signees is attached as an Appendix to the brief, but among the signatories are two Nobel Laureates in Economics (Vernon Smith and Daniel McFadden) and many household names in economics and law and economics, including Donald Boudreaux, Henry Butler, Tyler Cowen, Harold Demsetz, Richard Epstein, Mark Grady, and a bunch of other people whose names just happen to come later in the alphabet and I fear slighting by my inability to list all of the… [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 11:24 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am
Supreme Court ruling in MercExchange v. eBay, which dramatically clipped the legal tools available to patent trolls; Tiffany v. eBay, which redefined secondary trademark infringement online; Section 230’s applicability to online marketplaces (including the Stoner, Gentry, Hill, and Inman cases); and much more. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 10:49 am
v=6vwNcNOTVzY http://books.google.com/books/about/Moll_Flanders.html? [read post]
