Search for: "*davis v. Strickland" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
(Judge Bress surely knows the difference between the "no deficient performance" and "no prejudice"  prongs of Strickland; indeed, later in the opinion, on a different point about mitigating evidence, he expressly relies upon a "no prejudice" holding with respect to that -- separate -- issue.)So that part of the opinion seems just wrong.Judge Bress then follows this conclusion with what purports to be a separate point -- an effort to argue that, yeah,… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Strickland rejected that last week. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Davis, No. 16-6219, involves the continuing fallout from Martinez v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
David; Hedrick, Charles V.; Lever Jr., Chauncey W.; Adams, Christi; Griffin, Christopher L.; Kise, Christopher M.; Creely, Curt P.; Bachrach, Daniel (Dan); Zenov, Darin I.; Cook, David C.; Woodson, R Duke; Baxa Jr., Edmund T.; Lotzia, Emerson M.; Magee, Emily; Cerezo, Francisco J.; Ridley, Fred S.; Davis, Gardner F.; Koch, Gary D.; Fernandez-Quincoces, Guillermo J.; Raij, Irwin P.; Arkin, J. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 5:01 am by Lee Davis
The second is where appointed counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, where the claim should have been raised, was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm by Gideon
No specific showing of prejudice was required in Davis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Aurora Barnes
Brown 17-887 Issue: Whether the Indiana procedure that allows trial-counsel Strickland v. [read post]