Search for: "*douglass v. First"
Results 21 - 40
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
In November 2017, counsel appeared on behalf of Douglass. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:34 am
To the extent that the case does implicate the First Amendment, it is constitutional under the standard for false utterances set forth by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:48 pm
Silipo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:24 pm
First, the court reiterated that the question at issue is a close one and implicates important concerns about the Seventh Amendment and the interplay of various sections of Title VII. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:15 pm
State, No. 103,915 (Douglass)K.S.A. 60-1507 appeal (petition for review)Jessica R. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm
In the case, Whitney v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
The progressive originalism of the twenty-first century has deep roots, starting with the first wave of progressive originalism led by Frederick Douglass. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm
As one would expect, Douglass offered praise of Lincoln. [read post]
23 May 2018, 2:57 am
Judge denies motion to dismiss Title IX suit against Laura Kipnis [Maddie Burakoff, Daily Northwestern, KC Johnson thread on Twitter] First Circuit appeal considers whether persons unconnected with a university can initiate Title IX complaints against it [District of Rhode Island decision in Doe v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
First things first: I strongly recommend to everyone Mary Sarah Bilder's new article, Without Doors: Native Nations and the Convention, which has just appeared in a truly remarkable symposium in the Fordham Law Review on The Federalist Constitution. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:44 am
Supreme Court to see who will carry the burden of proof in such cases This is known as the “McDonnell Douglass framework” as it came from the Supreme Court’s ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
ShareThis article is the first entry in a symposium on the court’s decision in Brnovich v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:54 pm
Under Title VII, when there is, as here, no direct evidence of employment discrimination, the claims are to be analyzed under the burden shifting test of McDonnell Douglass v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:22 pm
Supreme Court’s 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:31 pm
Carr and Chaplinsky v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:20 am
When driving your golf cart on a golf course, ordinary negligence is the standard of care and not the “reckless misconduct” standard applicable to recreational activities according to the Michigan Court of Appeals in Bertin v Mann, No.328885.Facts:Kenneth Bertin and Douglass Mann were playing golf at the Farmington Hills Golf Club on May 22, 2013. [read post]
