Search for: "*hale v. Shields" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
There is little section 1983 case law concerning inter-agency intervention, but the Fifth Circuit ruled in Hale v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Mark Latham
ShareOn Wednesday, the justices will hear argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Feyziyev v Radu was listed before Whipple J on the same day but the matter has settled. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Br. 35–36, but neither did they leave each State wholly free to hale other States before its courts, contra Br. in Opp. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The result in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
Accordingly, their claims for compensation for injury to feelings could not succeed. [54] Judgment Judgment for the Supreme Court was given by Lord Toulson, with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Reed and Hughes agreed. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:34 am by Joel N. Kreizman
Hale, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the Defendant, Shellee Hale was not entitled to the benefit of the Shield Law. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
Lady Hale also pointed out that the form of words used in the Age Regulations (see now the EA 2010) were intended to make it easier, rather than more difficult, to establish indirect discrimination. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
  Mark Fleming of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP will argue the case for Joel Judulang. [read post]