Search for: "*harris v. United Marine Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises, a group of fishermen seek to clarify the doctrine’s reach by challenging a National Marine Fisheries Service rule that requires fishermen to pay the salaries of at-sea monitors who collect scientific, economic, and regulatory compliance data. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
But many have criticized the report for downplaying the harried nature of OAR/OAW. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am
Harris v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 2:35 pm
Senate by an all-Democrat 50-50 party line vote, with Vice President Harris breaking the tie and ensuring passage. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
” Factual Background National Marine Fisheries Service Logo The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), Pub. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 2:53 am
If the leaker of the draft opinion, skewering former Justice Harry Blackmun, and overturning Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
” Vice President Kamala Harris criticized Beijing for undermining the rules-based order and threatening the sovereignty of other South China Sea nations. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
In 2019, based on Rust, the Department of Health and Human Services instituted new referral and separation provisions. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
Harris v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:28 am
” Vice President Mike Pence was presiding over the Senate during the vote, and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was also present, so the building likely satisfied the requirement that it contain a “person protected by the Secret Service. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:37 am
Supreme Court upheld male-only registration in Rostker v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
E.g., Matthews v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Jason Gregory Johns, Harris Huguenard, Lionel M. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
It is mainly conceived as a response to the most pressing internal and external economic and strategic challenges faced by China, and as an instrument at the service of the PRC’s vision for itself as the uncontested leading power in the region in the coming decades. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 2:16 pm
See United States v. [read post]
