Search for: "*hill v. State of Texas"
Results 1 - 20
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 5:16 pm
Tisdale AUSTIN—Texas attorneys elected Cindy V. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court case of Texas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:11 pm
Jessie Hill (Case Western Reserve University - School of Law) has posted The Constitutional Right to Make Medical Treatment Decisions: A Tale of Two Doctrines (Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, December 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 10:17 am
Cooks is also presently under indictment in the Northern District of Texas in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:28 pm
From today's decision by Judge Robert Pitman in Fund Texas Choice v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Supreme Court ruling Atkins v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 5:35 am
She was the president pro tem of the Senate for a period and also served a single day as acting state governor. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court, the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Texas Gov. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:52 pm
Trevino, which concerns the arrest of a Castle Hills, Texas councilwoman who argues that she was arrested in retaliation for her critical speech about the city’s government. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:22 am
Lona Hills Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 11:06 am
See State ex rel. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:28 am
A 2012 Supreme Court ruling, Martinez v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 6:06 am
West Courtroom at Fifth Circuit Courthouse The Hill reports that the Fifth Circuit has announced that it has set a date to hear an expedited appeal of District Court Judge Andrew Hanan's preliminary injunction halting the implementation of the Obama... [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
By Sarah Steward-Lindsey In Flint Hill Resources, LP v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The current team of lawyers for Hill, the client being tapped for the multi-million dollar amount in attorney’s fees by his former counsel is crying foul, and three amicus briefs, including one by AG Paxton filed on behalf of the State of Texas, have joined the chorus. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:50 am
Wofford, et al v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Related Articles From Our Blog Gandy v Camp Thurman: Trespassing and Texas Premises Liability Law The Estate Of Marc Palotay et al v. [read post]
