Search for: "*johnson v. Hollis" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Held, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of are that Mr Sivananthan misled or misinformed Boris Johnson, then campaigning for election as Prime Minister, causing Mr Johnson to refer in his letter to ‘deepening ties’ with Sri Lanka. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court On 29 April 2021 there was a statement in open court [pdf] in the case of Al-Khair Foundation and another v Times Newspapers Limited before Johnson J. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Matthew Landis
Johnson – in which the Court held that flag burning qualified as constitutionally protected expression under the First Amendment. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:59 am
Contents include: David Langlet, Exporting co2 for Sub-Seabed Storage: The Non-Effective Amendment to the London Dumping Protocol and Its Implications Maria Adelaide Ferreira, Carlos Pereira da Silva, Holly V. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:24 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Amanda Hollis-Brusky argues that, although the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]