Search for: "*long v. Brown"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm
Just as the Civil Rights Movement began years before Brown, Sims is emblematic the segregated South's "long history" of resistance to civil rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
See Browning v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
On 15 February 2012, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Sugar (deceased) v BBC & Anor, the long-awaited conclusion of a dispute that has been ongoing since 2005. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:50 pm
Crabill et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:18 pm
Clare Brown, Library and Information Manager, is a member of the Cyber Investigation Unit at Collyer Bristow LLP. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:29 pm
Moroever, since Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:07 am
Brown. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Ferguson, a precedent of long standing. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 5:31 am
Guillory did not have a lawyer and because the journal entry summarily denying his 1507 motion did not inform him of the right to appeal or deadlines for an appeal, he should fall under Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:11 pm
From People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
Below is the transcript of the second half of my phone interview with Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow about her new book on Brown v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:37 am
Crown Packaging Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
The post Does State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
The post Does State v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:30 am
With the 60th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Brown v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:35 am
One of the cases argued with Brown, Bolling v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:55 pm
Documents from all five cases of Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:51 pm
Sullivan hasn't passed the bar -- he did, long ago -- but rather because he's not currently entitled to practice law in California. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am
Browning's name from the ballot in the primary election "should not be interpreted as prohibiting an individual who has previously served as a County Legislator for 12 consecutive years from thereafter seeking a new term in that office, so long as the new term sought is not consecutive to the preceding term. [read post]
