Search for: "*smith v. Lucas" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
The idea appears to have been widely accepted — for example it was argued by counsel in Cardwell v Lucas (1836) 2 Meeson and Welsby 111 150 E.R. 691 and upheld by yhe Court of Exchequer in Gandy v Jubber (1865) 5 Best and Smith 15 122 E.R. 914. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The winner will receive a ticket to the 1-day conference Copyright and Technology taking place at Reed Smith LLP’s London offices on 1 October 2014. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 4:35 am
The Kat at stake is the brilliant Darren, the Christopher Rennie-Smith at stake is Katfriend Christopher Rennie-Smith of Collyer-Bristow. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
On 22 October 2015 there will be an application in the case of Barnes v Smith & ors. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 5:26 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Linde v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
  As Lucas reported in April, it concerns a US trade mark application covering a mouse-head design that Disney considers confusingly similar, also diluting its several trade marks that depict the globally famous head of Micky Mouse. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
is not a trade mark says the CFI (IPKat)   France Evian revamps its bottle with a little joywashing, teams up with designer Paul Smith (Class 99) Second HADOPI law faces constitutionality test by French Socialists (Intellectual Property Watch)   Germany Good news for copyright infringers or a Trapp to Tripp designers? [read post]