Search for: "*thompkins, in Re" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2010, 2:18 pm by Steve Vladeck
As importantly, the controversy that was re-ignited after Faisal Shahzad's failed Times Square plot is largely about questioning prior to the provision of Miranda warnings. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 He was convicted by an Oakland County Jury in May 2002 of first degree murder, assault, and a variety of weapons charges.The case was initially assigned to now-retired Judge Richard Kuhn and subsequently re-assigned to Judge Michael Warren. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 He was convicted by an Oakland County Jury in May 2002 of first degree murder, assault, and a variety of weapons charges.The case was initially assigned to now-retired Judge Richard Kuhn and subsequently re-assigned to Judge Michael Warren. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:44 am by Russ Bensing
Complicating the issue here is that we’re talking about two separate rights — self-incrimination and counsel — and two separate concepts — invocation and waiver. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:07 am by NBlack
Thompkins, No. 08-1470.At issue in Berghuis was whether the defendant, Van Chester Thompkins, a suspect in a shooting, waived his Miranda rights by remaining silent and then, after three hours of interrogation, responded to a question from one of the interrogating officers with a one-word response. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:28 pm by Nathan
Thompkins (opinion here) that you need to actually tell the cops that you’re invoking your right to remain silent, if you want them to stop asking questions (or at least not be able to use your subsequent responses against you). [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:49 pm
.''Delorise Thompkins, 64, who works at South Miami Hospital, agreed with her colleague on the first jury.''I think it may hang again,'' she said. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 2:12 pm by Jon Ibanez
” I agree with Zilversmit’s conclusion; you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:55 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  Last year it was Warden Berguhis v Thompkins; this year it's Rick Bryant's case.Kinda sad that we're known for the laws that get spawned from these murders.http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/info@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:38 am by Jon Ibanez
” I agree with Zilversmit’s conclusion; you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 7:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  Last year it was Warden Berguhis v Thompkins; this year it's Rick Bryant's case.Kinda sad that we're known for the laws that get spawned from these murders.http://www.clarkstonlegal.com/info@clarkstonlegal.com [read post]