Search for: "*u. S. v. Price" Results 141 - 160 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The question of whether the purchase price was in fact paid became the subject of a separate action in the Supreme Court, New York County (hereinafter the New York County action), which was dismissed based upon the statute of frauds, because the plaintiffs did not produce the contract of sale (see Komolov v Segal, 40 Misc 3d 1228[A], 2013 NY Slip Op 51339[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2013], affd 117 AD3d 557 [2014]). [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 3:39 pm by Bevin Newman and Thomas Dillickrath
At the Supreme Court, the NCAA cited the Court’s previous decision in the 1984 case NCAA v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Improvements to the IRS’s technological infrastructure could reduce the tax gap while not creating new burdens for taxpayers. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am by Eric Goldman
The plaintiff is represented by Browne George Ross, the same law firm that brought the unsuccessful Prager U v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court‘s recent opinion in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This was largely motivated by pharmaceutical firms’ commercial considerations, i.e. stronger patent protections usually result in higher drug prices. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
  The NCAA didn't just lose in today's Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 6:23 am by Chris Castle
Overage at $0.0018 per performancePer-station: +100%Overage: +17%After 2022, these rates are adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U for the geeks). [read post]