Search for: "*u. S. v. Woods" Results 81 - 100 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2007, 9:19 pm
Stoler set up a competing importing business and sold items from THE LEAF COLLECTION to Bourne’s customers without Bourne’s authorization, infringing Bourne’s trade dress.The parties’ Stipulation and Final Judgment describes THE LEAF COLLECTION’s trade dress as: “banana leaves, reticulate venaton on each banana leaf, each leaf has dark shading representing the venation and outline, the leaves are… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
This was a significant increase from last year's tally of 52 programs and 58 in 2021. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, as the Court ruled in Vasquez v Wood (18 AD3d 645, 646 [2d Dept Z O O S l ) , the Hotel Defendants have not been convicted of a crime, and there have been no cases which broaden the applicability of this provision as the First Department has broadened CPLR 215 (8) in Alford. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
That’s the interesting question addressed not for the first time by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Marcy Friedman in Quazzo v 9 Charlton Street Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 30097(U) [Sup Ct NY County Jan. 10, 2019]. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the May 17, May 24, May 31 and June 7 conferences)   Wood v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
But in terms of ensuring that the end use of our exports does not offend fundamental principles of humanity, we are by no means out of the woods. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
” To Judge Kenneth Ripple in dissent and Chief Judge Diane Wood dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, Barrett’s interpretation of consular nonreviewability and Mandel went too far, abdicating judicial responsibility to ensure the executive branch executes immigration process according to statute and the Constitution. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 6:28 am
Brindley's withdrawal cured the potential conflict, removing any possible Sixth Amendment concern.U.S. v. [read post]