Search for: "*u.s. v. Bartholomew"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
Kastenberg, Goldwater v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
The U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Roisman, U.S. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm
Bartholomew (U.S. 1995): The failure to disclose inadmissible information does not constitute a Brady violation where there is only “mere speculation” about whether its disclosure would have led to admissible evidence. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
The Federalist Papers anticipated that U.S. constitutional developments would clarify and reduce constitutional ambiguities. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:04 am
Circuit — Tuaua v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68(1985)). [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Seuss’s Bartholomew and the Oobleck Christopher R. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
., New Futures Trading International Corporation and Henry Roche, U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]