Search for: "*u.s. v. Bartholomew" Results 1 - 20 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:39 pm by John Floyd
Bartholomew (U.S. 1995): The failure to disclose inadmissible information does not constitute a Brady violation where there is only “mere speculation” about whether its disclosure would have led to admissible evidence. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Rocketdyne plant that built world’s most powerful rocket engines being razed, August 25, 2016, By Dana Bartholomew, LA Daily News More Blog Entries: Grant v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm by Mark Graber
The Federalist Papers anticipated that U.S. constitutional developments would clarify and reduce constitutional ambiguities. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Seuss’s Bartholomew and the Oobleck Christopher R. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
., New Futures Trading International Corporation and Henry Roche, U.S. [read post]