Search for: "*u.s. v. Melton" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
The final sentence of 35 USC 103(a), entirely unaffected by KSR v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:07 pm
Last week the plaintiff's lawyer in a now settled product liability lawsuit against GM that showed that the car maker knew about the defective ignition switch before the cars were sold, sent a letter to the NHTSA asking them to require GM to explain why it only had recalled half of the cars affected by an ignition switch issue that previously led to the death of his former client (Melton v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:04 am
Those concerns, however, did not pose an immediate threat to defendant and thus do not fall within the purview of the emergency exception to the warrant requirement (see generally People v Molnar, 98 NY2d 328, 332; People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-178, cert denied 426 U.S. 953). [read post]