Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. J. and D. J., Parents"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:17 pm
Murphy, Legal Images of Fatherhood: Welfare Reform, Child Support Enforcement, and Fatherless Children, 81 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
Murphy, Legal Images of Fatherhood: Welfare Reform, Child Support Enforcement, and Fatherless Children, 81 NOTRE DAME L. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 am
Marcus L. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
L. has not given-in to the Respondent's persistence in keeping his children from him over the last fourteen years and simply gone on with his life without the children as, no doubt, many other parents in the same situation would have and, indeed, have done. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42] The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43] South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Super. 234, 246-47 (J. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[12] Charles J. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
[J.] be uprooted from a non-Indian environment and placed in an Indian one.[42] The Oklahoma Supreme Court concluded that ICWA only applies when Indian children are removed from existing Indian family environments.[43] South Dakota adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1987 in Claymore v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The latest issue of the Rabels Zeitschrift (Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009) is a special issue on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Professor Jürgen Basedow and contains the following articles: Dietmar Baetge: Contingency Fees – An Economic Analysis of the Federal Constitutional Court’s Decision Authorising Attorney Contingency Fees – the English abstract reads as follows: In Germany, until recently, contingency… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I think there are a range of respectable views about the issues I canvass here, but this is my take and I’d be interested in other people’s thoughts upon it. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
There is no communication regarding health, education or welfare of the children. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Must law defer to science in matters of parentage? [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm
Separate Property of Each PartyThe parties wish to identify what will remain the separate property of each party during the domestic partnership, and to determine their rights in the event of a separation or dissolution of their domestic partnership, as hereinafter discussed.The following shall constitute and remain the “separate property” of the respective parties: (a) property, whether real or personal, and whether vested, contingent, or inchoate, belonging to or acquired by a party… [read post]
