Search for: "-CWH Downing v. Graves et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Goldsmith et al would affect the Prince infringement cases. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
The conditions for the indication of provisional measures laid down in the Court’s jurisprudence can easily be met in a situation as harrowing as the one in Gaza. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
Sarah Craig et al, Equality Commission for Northern Ireland & Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission: European Union Developments in Equality and Human Rights: The Impact of Brexit on the Divergence of Rights and Best Practice on the Island of Ireland. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:03 am
In Restaurant Law Center et al. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Les appelants Nguene Nguene et Lapaix ont été déclarés coupables de plusieurs infractions en lien avec une série d’incidents violents survenus dans les rues de Montréal. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:22 pm
In US v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
It thus fails the First Amendment test set forth in Bishop, for reasons discussed in more detail in the Brief of Appellees Novoa et al. at 34-39. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
The prosecution of Bush, et al. would have been a mistake, but the prosecution of Donald Trump is unfortunately the right thing to do.To begin with, I am an abolitionist. [read post]
7 May 2023, 4:00 am
Elles ne portent donc pas atteinte de manière grave ou importante au coeur de la compétence fédérale. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” Other briefs that make this argument: Seattle School District No. 1; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), Congressman Mike Johnson (R-LA), et al. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:03 pm
Rosette, et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:43 am
In the landmark case of Huizhou Weitong Real Estate Co., Ltd v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
OHIO, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A247 v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
L’accusé et sa conjointe se sont rendus à un cinéma pornographique de Montréal pour avoir des relations sexuelles. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 10:35 am
This is why the recent case of Estate of Kareem Watson et al v. [read post]
