Search for: "-CWH Downing v. Graves et al" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Juan Romagoza, CJA's lead plaintiff in Romagoza et. al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Clinton Amos et al., A Meta-Analysis of Consumer Impulse Buying, 31 J. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
" Global-Tech Appliances et al v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Here, Muller et al. have created an excellent book with wide-reaching appeal whose focal point and strength are Bill Manbo's photographs. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]