Search for: "-FHM Holland v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am by Sherica Celine
Recent Supreme Court Rulings Impacting Labor & Employment Podcast Listen to attorney Tim Taylor of Holland & Knight discuss the implications of Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Renfro, Florida State University, “Criminalizing CARE: AIDS, the Ryan White CARE Act, and the Politics of Innocence”Kirstine Taylor, Ohio University, “Producing Racial Innocence: The Fall of Chain Gangs and the Rise of Prisons in North Carolina"Abby Whitaker, Temple University, “‘C is for Colorblindness’: Sesame Street, Race, and the Transformation of Liberalism"REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND POLITICS  Moderator: Gillian Frank, Host of Sexing… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in February and March 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
The Court also observed that nuisance does not protect privacy in related jurisdictions, referring to the High Court of Australia decision in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor ((1937) 58 CLR 479). [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Henn, 68 So. 3d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (“trial court erred by excluding the medical bills showing the full amount of the charges”); Taylor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm by Jim Walker
”  It constitutes a violation of MARPOL Annex V and potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm by Jamie Baker
Holland, Setting the Caged Bird Free: Restoring Judicial Power to Meaningfully Review Administrative Interpretations of the Law, 49 TEX. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]