Search for: "-MAS THOMAS v. ADAMS et al" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
Brightful, et al., granting the defendants' pre-trial motions to exclude the opinion of a drug recognition expert (DRE) in each of the consolidated cases. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm by Andrew Raff
Fox Television Stations, et al. (07-582), in which a 5-4 majority found that the FCC acted on a rational basis in changing its policy on fleeting expletives. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 11:49 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief in support of Texas from Babylon Bee et al Amicus briefs in support of NetChoice/CCIA preliminary injunction motion Chamber of Progress et al EFF RCFP et al TechFreedom Texas response. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  For those of you who haven't been following the story, here's a brief recap, shamelessly borrowing from William's prior posts: Jones, et al., were investors in mutual funds managed by Harris Associates, an investment adviser. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
County of Nassau v Nassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., et al., decision posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01749.htm; 3. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
County of Nassau v Nassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc., et al., decision posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2021/2021_01749.htm; 3. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
On September 3, 2009, twenty-five corporate law and finance professors and scholars - including several contributors to this blog - filed an amici curiae brief in the case of Jones et al. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Chamber of Commerce, represented by Richard Bernstein and Barry Barbash of Willkie Farr Investment Company Institute, represented by Seth Waxman of WilmerHale Last month, the following amici filed  in support of the petitioners Jones, et al.: Law Professors (specifically, the professors are Barbara Aldave, myself, Barbara Black, Douglas Branson, Jim Cox, Steven Davidoff, Lisa Fairfax, Jim Fanto, Jesse Fried, Theresa Gabaldon, Joan MacLeod Heminway, Don… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller, Scott) Modified to add filers on 11/29/2017 (znmw). [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:30 am
Round Table Pizza Inc. et al., No. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:27 pm
The court in Marbury held that it could not force James Madison, Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson, to deliver commissions signed by John Adams just before leaving office. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:19 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Although it was not crystal clear, the agreement was technically with Thomas Seidl, one of the partners of Total Recall. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:02 am by Miguel Larios
  The Comstock case will return to the Fourth Circuit, where, as Justice Breyer observed, Graydon Earl Comstock (et al) may raise due process, equal protection claims or any other individual rights claims on which the court has not yet ruled. [read post]