Search for: "-REW Harris v. Anderson et al"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm
Rogers, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL 891405. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
This anxiety about a representative – or reflective – judiciary was captured most vividly in the Supreme Court’s decision in R.D.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Nash & Cynthia Robbins JJDPA (box accompanying Cahn et al.) [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
In a longitudinal study that followed 4,724 known sex offenders over a period of 15 years, 24% were charged with, or convicted of, a new sexual offense (Harris & Hanson, 2004). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
In an earlier survey of 3,999 persons in California, 3.2% reported drinking raw milk (Headrick et al, 1997). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Easton Enterprises et al (CAFC 2010-1057, -1116) precedential Tokai didn't get evidence in because of procedural error: failure to submit written reports for its experts, Jones and Sung. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Anderson, the Section 3 case. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
