Search for: "-RSB Morel v. District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
The Judge also noted that AFP and Getty made a $2 million settlement offer to Morel on the eve of trial, substantially more than the $1.2 million Morel could have received. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
WOS * Court Blasts “Copyright Troll” for Treating Courts “as an ATM”–Strike 3 v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:53 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued recently in a civil case involving claims under both statutes:  Brooks v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Readers are entitled to form their own opinions ...Another talented friend of the IPKat is Chantal Morel (the eponymous Morel of Amsterdam IP practice Klos Morel Vos & Schaap). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
My co-panelist Clare Morell of the Ethics and Public Policy Center put together an excellent tweet thread summarizing some of her thoughts, including on the anonymous-speech angle. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
This question will soon potentially get an answer, after a claim was commenced in the District Court of the Middle District of Pennsylvania, as reported on JDSupra. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:31 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: District Court S D New York rejects Agence France-Presse’s attempt to claim license to Haiti earthquake photos through Twitter/Twitpic terms of service: AFP v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Thus we agree that the district court correctly applied the “but for” test. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:35 am
District Court For The Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:00 am by Andrew Berger
But a number of district courts, including Agence France v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:09 pm by Shea Denning
Morel, 922 F.3d 1 (1st 2019) Facebook registration information, billing records, and session times and durations, see United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Rumsfeld, where the plaintiffs filed a reply brief contesting the District Court’s holding that the defendants acted within the scope of their employment when detaining Al Laithi and the other detainees. [read post]