Search for: "-WMC In re the Application of Chevron Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
(KSG), pursuant to discovery applications that the Chevron applicants filed under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm by WIMS
In this complicated case involving an environmental damages action in Ecuador, South America and a New Jersey environmental consulting firm, the Appeals Court explains, this matter comes on before this Court on appeal from a District Court's order entered June 15, 2010, granting Chevron Corporation the opportunity to engage in discovery pursuant to its application under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Author
FEC generally are focused on corporate electioneering. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
The case of the day is In re Application of Chevron Corp. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:58 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Kaplan's ruling Wednesday in In re Application of Chevron Corp., 10 MC 00002, stands, Chevron's counsel from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and counsel for two former Chevron lawyers facing criminal charges in Ecuador will be able to ask lead plaintiffs attorney Steven Donziger questions, under oath, about his alleged attempts to influence a supposedly neutral expert appointed by the Ecuadorean court to offer a global damages assessment. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
” Here’s some proof that there’s such a thing as work/life balance in Biglaw… which is only applicable if you’re a partner. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am by Francis Pileggi
For example, the court explained that the company involved did not comply with required corporate formalities such as minutes of board meetings and that it often conducted corporate business informally, including over email, regarding the issues subject to the Section 220 demand. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 8:03 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A spokesperson for the defendant stated in 2014, We’re going to fight this until hell freezes over. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am by Broc Romanek
See In Re Burkin, 1 N.Y.2d 570, 572 (1956) ("At common law, stockholders have the traditional inherent power to remove a director for cause which is known as 'amotion'.") [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm by John Bellinger
   They argue that there is no split among the circuit courts on the issue of corporate liability (despite the Second Circuit’s decision in In re Arab Bank). [read post]