Search for: "-WWD SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
Before the lawsuit was filed, however, Smith & Nephew sent letters to the Department of Defense Inspector General and to the Veterans Affairs National Acquisition Center voluntarily disclosing that it had supplied products to the Defense Department and VA that were manufactured in Malaysia, China, and Thailand and thus failed to comply with federal procurement law. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:14 pm by Andrew Hamm
§ 3.156(c)(1)’s “reconsideration” provision encompasses all records that “go to a benefits criterion,” or is instead restricted to only those records that “relate to the basis of the [Department of Veterans Affairs’] initial denial of benefits,” as in Kisor v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
City of Seattle (Judicial futility doctrine and removal from state court to federal court) Two petitions for certiorari were denied on 3/20/23:Smith v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:00 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Department of the Interior (Water Rights; Trust Breach)Dutchover v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 1:59 am
For information regarding subscribing to Gallerywatch services contact [www.gallerywatch.com] Â Subscription needed for online access: Â 11/10/2009 Draft Legislative Text of the Restoring American Financial Stability Act, S.G.W. 130 (PDF 1.7 MB) Draft of the Bill as Expected to be Unveiled by Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chairman Chris Dodd on Nov. 10, 2009 11/10/2009 Summary: Restoring American Financial Stability Act, S.G.W. 130 (PDF 276 KB) Summary of the Bill as… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm by Amy Howe
In 2016, the Department of Veterans Affairs made changes to its interpretation of the Agent Orange Act by revising the manual in which it publishes its policies and procedures for resolving claims for benefits. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:36 am by Max Kohn
Algieri with the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General’s Northeast Field Office. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
O’Rourke, 17-1693 Issues: (1) Whether judicial review of an interpretative Department of Veteran Affairs’ regulation under the Administrative Procedures Act should be foreclosed under 38 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am by Tod M. Leaven
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am by Tod M. Leaven
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Department of Veterans Affairs medical evaluators, (including physician assistants, nurses and other non-physician health practitioners) to provide an expert opinion on any medical issue, thereby placing the burden on disabled veteran claimants, most of whom are pro se and many of whom suffer “from very significant psychiatric and physical disabilities,” to rebut the presumption by raising a competency objection, by ascertaining evidence of the… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has authority to review an interpretive rule reflecting the Department of Veterans Affairs’ definitive interpretation of its own regulation, even if the VA chooses to issue that rule through its adjudication manual Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
Wilkie, the court will similarly look at whether the Federal Circuit has the authority to review an interpretation by the Department of Veteran Affairs of its own regulation. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am by John Elwood
Department of Veterans Affairs medical evaluators, (including physician assistants, nurses and other non-physician health practitioners) to provide an expert opinion on any medical issue, thereby placing the burden on disabled veteran claimants, most of whom are pro se and many of whom suffer “from very significant psychiatric and physical disabilities,” to rebut the presumption by raising a competency objection, by ascertaining evidence of the… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:53 am by Larry Tolchinsky
For purposes of this subsection, “a reasonable effort” includes contacting the county veterans service office or regional office of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. (2)? [read post]