Search for: ". Tilden"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2021, 2:58 pm
Tilden 482 (John Bigelow, ed., N.Y., Harper Brothers 1885) (emphasis added); see also id. ch. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 12:16 pm
Tomasini-Joshi served, inter alia, as as an Assistant Dean for Public Service and the Executive Director for the Root-Tilden-Kern Program at NYU Law School; as a Policy Analyst on Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project at the Council of State Governments; and as a Staff Attorney for Columbia University’s Goddard-Riverside Tenant Assistant Project. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:14 pm
Tilden 482 (John Bigelow, ed., N.Y., Harper Brothers 1885) (emphasis added); see also id. ch. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
Last Wednesday, as I was planning to start writing my Verdict column for publication the next day, news broke that violent rioters had invaded the United States Capitol on what would soon turn into a deadly and murderous rampage. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 7:42 pm
In the past, Congress drafted (and President Harrison signed into law) the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which purported (in the wake of the Tilden-Hayes electoral debacle of 1876-77) to specify how future joint sessions of Congress would resolve disputed and duplicate votes from a given State. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 1:46 am
In the past, Congress drafted (and President Harrison signed into law) the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which purported (in the wake of the Tilden-Hayes electoral debacle of 1876-77) to specify how future joint sessions of Congress would resolve disputed and duplicate votes from a given State. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 2:55 pm
Tilden’s supporters called Hayes “Rutherfraud” after the election, but Tilden had accepted the election results. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:46 am
Cruz’s press release, on behalf of several other senators, provides in the relevant part:The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:16 am
The law has its origins in the contested presidential election of 1876 between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford B. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
They were informed by their experience of the Electoral Commission they created for the Hayes-Tilden dispute. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Hayes and Samuel Tilden. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
Tilden, however, rejected disorder. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:05 am
Hayes and Samuel Tilden is perhaps the closest the nation has come to experiencing a constitutional crisis related to presidential elections - and one law related to the 1876 dispute keeps popping up in scenarios linking that election to the 2020 contest. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:40 pm
Excluding the contested states’ votes would have lowered the denominator sufficiently for Tilden to win. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:31 am
It pitted Democrat Samuel Tilden against Republican Rutherford B. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:00 pm
LD: The Electoral Count Act was passed in the wake of the disastrous Hayes-Tilden election of 1876, when three states—Florida, South Carolina and Louisiana—submitted conflicting electoral certificates to Congress. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 12:53 pm
A157937, the court considered whether the primary assumption of the risk doctrine bars negligence claims against dog owners when an injury occurs in an off-leash dog-walking trail.[1] Factual background Diane Wolf and her husband were walking their dog on a trail in Tilden Regional Park on Oct. 6, 2016, in an area in which dogs are allowed to be off their leashes but only when the dogs are under their owners’ control. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Reconstruction came to an end with the removal of federal troops from the South as a concession to settle the disputed presidential contest between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford Hayes. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:26 am
Tilden, Ltd. v Profeta & Eisenstein, 236 AD3d 292 [1st Dept 1997] [contention that had attorneys filed timely motion for leave to appeal, court would have granted leave and reversed decision, and retrial would have resulted in more favorable outcome, too speculative to support causation]). [read post]
