Search for: "13 DB 2001"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2020, 9:03 am
T 1079/08, Gründe 4; T 2001/12, Gründe 3). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Ideas for Alternative Approaches Under one suggested approach for obtaining an IRS stamp of approval, the agency would establish or provide official recognition of a third-party certification system to fill the void left when it contracted the determination letter program—an idea that the IRS raised years ago in a 2001 White Paper. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 2:00 am
Ideas for Alternative Approaches Under one suggested approach for obtaining an IRS stamp of approval, the agency would establish or provide official recognition of a third-party certification system to fill the void left when it contracted the determination letter program—an idea that the IRS raised years ago in a 2001 White Paper. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
This is a long, tedious post. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:41 am
Captain Out ....13. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
Union of India,[10]to state that an award inherently possesses certain legal value and identity.[11]The Court stated that all claims between parties which are the subject-matter of a reference to arbitration, merge in the award which is rendered.[12]The effect of this is such that rights and liabilities of parties in respect of such claims can be determined only on the basis of such award.[13]No action may be started on the original claims which were the subject-matter of such… [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:21 am
This increased cost imposed on subscribers not interested in receiving BTN amounts to a "Big Ten Tax" in the amount of $13.20 annually, according to Comcast.12 In BTN's corner, commentators fire back that Comcast would not only force subscribers interested in BTN to pay for digital cable, but also to pay more than $70 annually for the premium sports package.13 While some might consider the $13 "Big Ten Tax" less-than-Comcastic, others would consider this… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:10 am
UOI, 2002 (6) AD (Delhi) 641 (DB) the court prohibited the carrying on of construction in the vicinity of ancient monuments Blocks A and A1 of Panchsheel Enclave which fell in an area declared as a green belt. [read post]
